6 alternatives to the WordPress CMS
In July 2016, 26.5% of websites were created with WordPress, putting it far ahead of all other CMSs on the market. WordPress alone holds 59.6% of the CMS market (Open Source and proprietary combined) according to W3Tech.
Its success has been built on the popularity of blogs and information sites created by individuals and small businesses. Today, WordPress is used for more than just the purposes for which it was created: high-traffic press sites, corporate websites, e-commerce sites, e-learning platforms, etc. The strengths of WordPress lie in its user-friendliness, which makes it extremely easy to design websites, and its rich ecosystem of extensions and themes.
SUMMARY
Why look for an alternative to WordPress?
Like all other tools for creating a website, WordPress has certain shortcomings. Here are a few of them:
- WordPress websites are subject to frequent attacks. This does not mean that WordPress is badly designed. It is attacked simply because it is the most popular CMS.
- Too many plugins can harm your site: if you have more than 20 active extensions, you are exposing yourself to security breaches because you have no guarantee that the extension publisher has secured it properly. What's more, you'll be reducing the performance of your site by making it more cumbersome. Finally, many plugins are discontinued, which can lead to data loss or an overnight shutdown.
- Modifying the theme requires skills in PHP, CSS and HTML: WordPress gives you access to the CSS style sheet and PHP files for modifying your theme. Don't venture into this without PHP skills, as a small error in the code can be fatal for the site.
Here are 6 alternatives to WordPress that may be better options depending on your context.
Drupal, Open Source CMS for complex sites
Drupal version 8 is excellent for creating complex, high-traffic websites, and is aimed at very technically advanced users.
Advantages of Drupal
- Many advanced options are native. So in some cases there are no plugins to install.
- Drupal is very well suited to developers, as it allows them to do a great deal with very little code. The configuration is often sufficient. The system is therefore easier to maintain.
- It is 100% API-based. Drupal is very open and can therefore easily coexist with a third-party application.
- The level of security is excellent.
Disadvantages of Drupal
- It is the most complex CMS on the market. It is aimed primarily at a technically advanced audience.
- Very poor media management. In 2016, Drupal still doesn't have a media manager worthy of the name!
- Few high-quality, up-to-date themes are available, even for a fee.
- Ergonomics, although improved in version 8, are not on a par with WordPress
Joomla! is an Open Source CMS between WordPress and Drupal
Joomla! is the second most widely used CMS after WordPress. A little more complex and advanced in technical and functional terms, Joomla! is nonetheless very user-friendly. Joomla! is aimed at designers of high-traffic sites with security issues. Joomla! can be used to create any type of site.
Advantages of Joomla!
- The technical potential of Joomla! has not detracted from its overall user-friendliness. It's a good compromise between Drupal and WordPress.
- Few attacks target Joomla! sites
- Excellent media management with a native folder tree structure
- Plenty of plugins and themes
Disadvantages of Joomla!
- The text editor is not as good as that of WordPress. It allows you to go further, but is sometimes confusing, with unexpected formatting.
- The navigation and organisation of the pages is not very intuitive. It takes a while to adapt to its logic
- Options are limited for advanced users (but sufficient for blogs, ecommerce sites and corporate sites)
- Many plugins are not free, unlike WordPress and Drupal. The most popular, however, are free.
TYPO3, Open Source CMS for corporate websites
TYPO3 is another Open Source CMS perfectly suited to corporate websites. TYPO3 is particularly popular in Europe, especially in Germany.
Advantages of TYPO3
- Easy management of websites for individuals and large corporations, with multilingual support
- Many native features that require WordPress extensions
- Very good management of traffic surges without loss of performance
- Easy, native site configuration. Native workflow management
Disadvantages of TYPO3
- 1,500 extensions, which is far fewer than the 46,000 of WordPress
- Reserved exclusively for corporate websites and intranets
Wix, world leader in proprietary site builders
Wix is designed for people with no technical skills. Wix is the world leader in private, all-in-one website creation tools.
Advantages of Wix
- All-in-one and no technical skills required
- Advanced features if required: e-commerce sites, online payments, user management, etc.
- History and maturity. Wix will be on the market for a very long time
Disadvantages of Wix
- Dependency from start to finish: impossible to leave Wix once you're there. On the other hand, Wix is a platform appreciated by its users, offering excellent ergonomics and very good functional coverage at a reasonable price.
- Google's recent, one-off downgrading of Wix sites may have dampened the spirits of many enthusiastic customers. Customers could only suffer damage without any control. Google no longer penalises Wix sites.
- Lack of flexibility: this is the flip side of ease of use. If you want to put your stamp on every layer of the site, it's best to go for an Open Source CMS.
memboGo, proprietary site builder for associations
memboGo is designed for associations and not-for-profit organisations. memboGo is much more than a CMS, as it also integrates all the functions needed to manage an association (accounting, member management, event management, donation management, etc.).
Advantages of memboGo
- Creation of a website that is perfectly integrated with the management of an association
- Easy to create, no technical skills required
Disadvantages of memboGo
- Aimed specifically at associations
- Does not have an ecosystem of plugins like WordPress to add a lot of functionality.
Google Sites, a basic but highly effective proprietary site builder
You never think of Google Sites when you want to create your own site, even though the Google Apps suite offers this functionality. Google Site is for people who want to publish content on the Internet very easily, without having to worry about everything else. No technical skills are required.
Advantages of Google Sites
- Extremely fast site creation
- Free and no hosting required for Google Apps customers
- Very structured for novices
- No security flaws to date
Disadvantages of Google Sites
- Impossible to create anything other than a blog, showcase site or intranet
- Unattractive themes
- Weak functional coverage
To find out more, see our guides on websites (CMS)